Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hazem Naow vs Niels Visker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Naow vs Visker analysis and find out who is favored!
Hazem Naow vs Niels Visker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Naow 1 - 0 Visker
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naow has won 49.4% of points on his second serve, while Visker has won 51.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naow, in recent form, has won 56.85% of his opponent's second serve points, while Visker has won 47.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.17% and 29.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naow has saved 62.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Visker has saved 67.62% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naow has won 69.14% of matches played (W/L 56/ 25), with Visker winning 62.34% (W/L 48/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 65/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 55/ 38). Visker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 43/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 66/ 44).
- Player level: In the last year, Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.08% of matches (W/L 38/ 14), where as Visker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.16% of matches (W/L 46/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Naow winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Naow winning 2 and Visker winning 0. The last match between Naow and Visker was at the M15 Buschhausen, 14-09-2023, Second, Clay with Hazem Naow getting the victory 6-4 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Naow and Visker have played a deciding set 0 times, with Naow winning 0 times and Visker 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Naow winning 1, and Visker 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naow has played against opponents with an average rank of 181.72 while Visker has played against players with an average rank of 144.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naow has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Visker has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naow has converted 43.95% of breakpoint opportunities, and Visker has converted 39.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
343
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
609
Rank
592
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
66% (152-80)
Career Total W/L
63% (116-68)
73% (27-10)
YTD W/L
65% (22-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Hazem Naow | Niels Visker |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:0 | 1:52:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (48/67) | 68% (65/95) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (36/48) | 69% (45/65) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (12/19) | 33% (10/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 14% (2/14) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (40/95) | 28% (19/67) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Hazem Naow
Player
Niels Visker
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
95)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hazem Naow | Niels Visker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 73% (27/10) | 65% (22/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (56/27) | 63% (47/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (424/337) | 53% (384/347) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 57% (8/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 76% (19/6) | 67% (6/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.65 |
| Aces Total | 77 | 233 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 133 | 81 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:3 | 1:22:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 250.19 | 109.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1595/2525) | 64% (1386/2182) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1105/1595) | 74% (1027/1386) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (456/930) | 51% (409/795) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (126/290) | 42% (69/165) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1067/2489) | 36% (740/2058) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (15/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (12/3) | 65% (22/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (27/37) | 64% (21/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 77% (10/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (23/23) | 92% (24/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (23/0) | 8% (24/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 0% (10/0) |
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Hazem Naow
95%
(
54 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
85%
(
52 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Hazem Naow
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Hazem Naow
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Hazem Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Niels Visker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Niels Visker
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Lootsma
Player
Niels Visker
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
5
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
14 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
19 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Yurii Dzhavakian
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(6) 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Matyas Cerny
Player
Niels Visker
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Niels Visker
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
99)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
112
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Pavel Verbin
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Jasza Szajrych
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Niels Visker
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Naow Vs Visker Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
